Lombok has been devastated with multiple earthquakes. Read how this disaster has impacted Indonesians and how the church can assist.
Does religion do more harm than good?
By Rev Prof Andrew Dutney
Posted in Culture
It’s been reported that two out of three Australians think that religion does more harm than good in the world. That’s not encouraging news at a time when there are questions being asked about whether or not the various tax exemptions and privileges that religious organisations enjoy in Australia should be wound back – or even dispensed with.
But the Ipsos Poll on which the report was based gave mixed messages about Australians and religion. While 63% agreed that religion does more harm than good in the world, 84% agreed with the statement, “I am completely comfortable being around people who have different religious beliefs than me”. So, on the one hand, scepticism about the value of religion and, on the other hand, high levels of toleration for religious diversity. What might this poll be telling us about Australians and their religions?
It’s worth thinking about how a poll like this works. In this case, it was a telephone poll of more than 17,000 people across 23 countries. There would have been an attempt to get balanced representation but, even so, it could have involved only a very small number of Australians – probably fewer than 1,000.
Also, those being polled were simply asked if they agreed or disagreed with a series of statements such as “My religion defines me as a person” (27% agreed) or “Religious people make better citizens” (25% agreed).
When some hundreds of Australians agreed with the statement “Religion does more harm than good in the world”, it’s not at all clear what they were actually thinking. It would have been a range of things. Certainly they would not all have had the same reasons for agreeing with the statement.
Nonetheless, it’s a worthwhile exercise to think about what some of those things might have been. What harm does religion do?
Some may have been thinking about religious bigotry and the harm that does in some families and communities. Australia has a sorry history of sectarianism – particularly of bitter conflict between Protestant and Catholic people. Thankfully, those days are behind us now, but it was still a very real part of Australian society when I was growing up.
Some people might have been thinking about religious extremism or about religiously motivated conflict.
Some might have been reflecting on the Royal Commission on Institutional Responses to Child Sex Abuse.
But about a third of those Australians who were polled did not agree with the statement. They thought that, on balance, religion does not do more harm than good. They might have even thought that religion did more good than harm (although we can’t know that). So what good might they have thought religion does?
If they practice a religion themselves, they probably do so because they find or believe that it has some benefit for them. There are many studies now that associate religious practice with improved mental health and wellbeing. They might have been thinking of the community life and pastoral care that’s made available to them in their faith community.
But even the Australians polled who do not practice a religion themselves might have been thinking of the caring services that religious communities offer. Christian congregations run drop-in centres, op shops, playgroups etc. Most religious organisations run schools, community services, and hospitals. UnitingCare Australia, for example, is a network of some 1,600 sites with 40,000 employees and 30,000 volunteers. Their impact for good on Australian society is huge.
In the light of the Ipsos Poll, a journalist asked me whether religion ‘should be trying to redeem itself’ in the eyes of the Australian public. I replied that I thought not.
The place of religion in Australian society has changed dramatically in recent decades. The proportion of Australians participating in a religion is now smaller, and the religious groups that Australians are involved in is now much more diverse. The community no longer automatically looks to religious representatives for moral leadership – or even for rites of passage such as weddings and funerals.
In this situation, it’s important that religious organisations don’t pretend that nothing has changed, and don’t try to steer things back to the way they once were – if that’s what ‘redeeming’ themselves means.
Instead, religious organisations need to get on with doing what they do – developing communities, practicing their faith, serving their own members and the wider community at real points of need. And they need to do what they do with integrity, fairness and transparency. That will be more than enough for Australians.
Rev Prof Andrew Dutney blogs regularly at Backyard Theology.
More from Culture
What does it mean to be intentional about intergenerational ministry? Dr Holly Allen helps us understand the blessing of ministry across generations.
Cooking is something of an art form – one that many people struggle to master. An initiative at Dernancourt Uniting Church aims to help men over the age of 50 who lack confidence in the kitchen.